What are Flaw in reasoning questions?
- It is a close cousin of MOR questions.
- Very rare. 5% of gmat questions. Expect to see it if you are doing well on the exam.
- Identify why/How the reasoning is flawed.
- Do not need ANY EXTERNAL Data.
What are various different flaws in reasoning?
- Improper Comparison
- Corelation misinterperated an Causality
- Use of Limited Sample
- Failure to consider Complete Picture
Improper Comparison
author comparies entities that
- Are Not comparable
- Are comparable only when cartain assumptions are met.
Corelation misinterperated an Causality
There are arguments which establishes causality simply based on coincidence of 2 events.Such arguments may be flawed , as the 2 events may ,in reality, be unrelated.
There Use of Limited Sample
There are arguments which establishes conclusion based on data, but the sufficiency of data can be easily questioned.
Failure to consider Complete Picture
Summary
Note that in all of the above mentioned flaws, the flaw arises from FLAWED Assumptions. There think of assumptions when solving this question type.
Flaw in reasoning vs Weaken
Flaw Weaken
Verbage Verbage
Which of the following explains Which of the following if true, will
why the argument is flawed? Point out the flaw in the argument.
Correct Answer Correct Answer
Doesn contain new info Contains new info
Analyses info in the passage Weakens the argument.
What is the process to approach Flaw questions?
- Read and understand the passage
- Create Logical Structure.
- PRETHINK using framework
- Evaulate the answer choice.
- It is a close cousin of MOR questions.
- Very rare. 5% of gmat questions. Expect to see it if you are doing well on the exam.
- Identify why/How the reasoning is flawed.
- Do not need ANY EXTERNAL Data.
What are various different flaws in reasoning?
- Improper Comparison
- Corelation misinterperated an Causality
- Use of Limited Sample
- Failure to consider Complete Picture
Improper Comparison
author comparies entities that
- Are Not comparable
- Are comparable only when cartain assumptions are met.
Corelation misinterperated an Causality
There are arguments which establishes causality simply based on coincidence of 2 events.Such arguments may be flawed , as the 2 events may ,in reality, be unrelated.
There Use of Limited Sample
There are arguments which establishes conclusion based on data, but the sufficiency of data can be easily questioned.
Failure to consider Complete Picture
Summary
Note that in all of the above mentioned flaws, the flaw arises from FLAWED Assumptions. There think of assumptions when solving this question type.
Flaw in reasoning vs Weaken
Flaw Weaken
Verbage Verbage
Which of the following explains Which of the following if true, will
why the argument is flawed? Point out the flaw in the argument.
Correct Answer Correct Answer
Doesn contain new info Contains new info
Analyses info in the passage Weakens the argument.
What is the process to approach Flaw questions?
- Read and understand the passage
- Create Logical Structure.
- PRETHINK using framework
- Evaulate the answer choice.